We had a short candy break during Donna and Katy's workshop while they asked us to ponder a question.
We had a short candy break during Donna and Katy's workshop while they asked us to ponder a question.
://www.youtube.com/v/jVygqjyS4CA&hl=en_US&fs=1″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true” width=”480″ height=”385″>
George Catalano joined us by Skype as we headed into the third session today. After some Skype issues (darn technology!), we switched to just audio and the presentation went well.
George then led us in "imagine" sessions which had us imagining what our conference would look like without differentiation, subjectivity, and community.
08-04-153538″ alt=”” src=”http://esjp.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/2010-08-04-153538-300×225.jpg” />
Jon Leydens is now giving his presentation. He started out with showing a cover of Prism (lower left) that definitely doesn’t resonate with our group as an example of the prevailing injustice in engineering practice.
In our first panel for ESJP 2010, Matthew Harrison talked about the efforts made in the UK to include traditionally non-represented groups such as women in engineering education.
Lisa McLoughlin talked about the tension between abstract knowledge and practical knowledge in engineering education especially as experienced by ”practical” students at a community college. The focus on the abstract knowledge might cause these practical students to feel “lost”. Ways of addressing this include focus on design and problem based learning.
Lisa asked if engineering education should change to accommodate students from non-traditional backgrounds? Her answer is “Yes”. We should at least expand the scope of whom we accommodate.
One question asked then was how do you get a wide range of students? Matthew took a shot at answering that by talking about using real life models in relevant areas.
Matthew argued that some reasons for people from low-socioeconomic background to become engineers are: 1. Money and secure job. 2. Flexible degree.
Lisa added that we should not underestimate the economic motivation from those from low-socioeconomic background. After all, it’s hard to support a family or change the world working at McDonalds.
Usman here. I missed a great first session due to a bad alarm clock and some train timing problems, but I did manage to catch a bit of the second session. Among other ideas, we talked about the access to engineering education to those who come from low-income backgrounds. Both Matthew and Lisa held the attention of the audience and it was a great session. I'll post some notes from the session soon.
The conference opened with a short welcome and introduction of the RSA by Matthew Taylor (RSA’s chief executive).
Caroline Baillie, the conference organizer, then dedicated the conference to the memory of Maren Somers.
Then all conference participants in attendance introduced themselves, Caroline gave a short introduction and overview of the history of the ESJP network, and some of the “old timers” shared their stories of how they come to be interested in engineering in relation to social justice and peace issues and came in contact with the ESJP network and how their experience and the network has evolved over the years.
Then we did a short exercise using postcards of William Blake paintings to find our critical friend for the conference, with whom attendees throughout the conference can discuss and reflect on their experience.